Archive for October, 2010

October 10th, 2010

For many websites there are a few pages (often including the home page) that have earned the most Google PageRank. Pages with higher authority via PageRank are the best bets for competing on more popular keywords. Selecting and targeting keywords is an art that’s often developed through successful (and less-than-successful) attempts to achieve Google first page organic ranking.

It’s a shame to waste PageRank so it’s arguably especially important to choose target keywords wisely on URLs with existing PageRank. Internet marketers will almost always look at traffic numbers associated with keywords to make keyword selection. Usually they’ll take stock of the level of competition that exists for gaining attention on a particular keyword or phrase. Additionally, it’s also important to consider the PageRank of URLs that currently rank on organic searches associated with the keyword.

For example let’s say your site’s home page has a Google toolbar PageRank of 3, and you’ve identified a keyword/phrase of interest. There’s significant traffic on the keyword and there’s not an excessive level of competition surrounding it. You might say great … we’ve got an opportunity here. But go one step further. Do a search on the keyword and look at the PageRank associated with all the sites with a first page position. If those site URLs have a PageRank of 5 or 6 then it will be hard to overtake them based solely on on-page optimization. You’re going to need more work on off-page optimization to effectively compete on that keyword. However, if there are ranking sites with a PageRank of 3 or 4, and especially if on-page optimization is not apparent, you might be able to compete.

The main point here is to include an evaluation of competing sites’ PageRank in the process of selecting target keywords. Now White House departed Rahm Emanuel is famous for saying “a crisis is a terrible thing to waste.” We say PageRank is a terrible thing to waste by unwise choices in keyword targeting.

October 7th, 2010

Effective today the Yahoo “search experience” will be different according to the company. Remember it’s no longer just a search engine but an experience.

Now that Microsoft’s Bing powers the Yahoo natural search results it’s even more important for Yahoo to find ways to differentiate its search and online properties. Among the improvements mentioned include more visual components, tab-based overviews, and what Yahoo considers to be navigation improvements.

Also in addition to making search more easy to navigate we’re told that the new Yahoo even helps with guiding users on what to search for. Apparently if nothing interests a person but the urge to search for something creeps in, Yahoo can help with a few ideas.

Will any of the improvements matter to searchers? If Yahoo’s market share for search increases then someone at Yahoo will likely deserve (or at least claim) the credit.